↓ Skip to main content

Combining Crowd-Sourcing and Automated Content Methods to Improve Estimates of Overall Media Coverage: Theme Mentions in E-cigarette and Other Tobacco Coverage

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Health Communication, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
11 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
Title
Combining Crowd-Sourcing and Automated Content Methods to Improve Estimates of Overall Media Coverage: Theme Mentions in E-cigarette and Other Tobacco Coverage
Published in
Journal of Health Communication, November 2019
DOI 10.1080/10810730.2019.1682724
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laura A. Gibson, Leeann Siegel, Elissa Kranzler, Allyson Volinsky, Matthew B. O’Donnell, Sharon Williams, Qinghua Yang, Yoonsang Kim, Steven Binns, Hy Tran, Veronica Maidel Epstein, Timothy Leffel, Michelle Jeong, Jiaying Liu, Stella Lee, Sherry Emery, Robert C. Hornik

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2019.
All research outputs
#1,044,946
of 13,978,194 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Health Communication
#107
of 1,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,731
of 258,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Health Communication
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,978,194 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,066 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 258,502 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them