You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Combining Crowd-Sourcing and Automated Content Methods to Improve Estimates of Overall Media Coverage: Theme Mentions in E-cigarette and Other Tobacco Coverage
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Health Communication, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1080/10810730.2019.1682724 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Laura A. Gibson, Leeann Siegel, Elissa Kranzler, Allyson Volinsky, Matthew B. O’Donnell, Sharon Williams, Qinghua Yang, Yoonsang Kim, Steven Binns, Hy Tran, Veronica Maidel Epstein, Timothy Leffel, Michelle Jeong, Jiaying Liu, Stella Lee, Sherry Emery, Robert C. Hornik |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 73% |
| Unknown | 3 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 6 | 55% |
| Members of the public | 4 | 36% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 56 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 23% |
| Unknown | 19 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 10 | 18% |
| Psychology | 3 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 18% |
| Unknown | 25 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2020.
All research outputs
#2,388,786
of 25,066,230 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Health Communication
#197
of 1,406 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,874
of 367,266 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Health Communication
#2
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,066,230 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,406 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,266 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.