You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Validation of the Comprehensive Feeding Practices Questionnaire with parents of 10-to-12-year-olds
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, August 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2288-11-113 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elisabeth L Melbye, Torvald Øgaard, Nina C Øverby |
| Abstract |
There is a lack of validated instruments for quantifying feeding behavior among parents of older children and adolescents. The Comprehensive Feeding Practices Questionnaire (CFPQ) is a self-report measure to assess multiple parental feeding practices. The CFPQ is originally designed for use with parents of children ranging in age from about 2 to 8 years. It is previously validated with American and French parents of children within this age range. The aim of the present study was to adapt and test the validity of this measure with parents of older children (10-to-12-year-olds) in a Norwegian setting. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 3% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 110 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 23 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 6% |
| Researcher | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 19 | 17% |
| Unknown | 26 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 25 | 22% |
| Psychology | 14 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Unknown | 30 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2012.
All research outputs
#3,251,863
of 22,664,267 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#515
of 2,000 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,736
of 120,649 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#4
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,664,267 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,000 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,649 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.