You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Multiple infection of amber Succinea putris snails with sporocysts of Leucochloridium spp. (Trematoda)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Parasitology Research, April 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00436-016-5082-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
G. L. Ataev, A. A. Zhukova, А. S. Tokmakova, Е. E. Prokhorova |
| Abstract |
Amber Succinea putris snails were collected in the Leningrad Region (Russia). Some of them were infected with trematodes Leucochloridium paradoxum, Leucochloridium perturbatum and Leucochloridium vogtianum. One snail had triple infection with all these species. Genotyping of sporocysts by ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 nucleotide sequences of ribosomal DNA (rDNA) and phylogenetic analysis were performed. The results confirmed the species identification of sporocysts of Leucochloridium based on the shape and colour of mature broodsacs. Sporocyst broodsacs could leave the host snail on their own, remaining viable in the environment for up to an hour. This ability of sporocysts may prevent the excessive infection of the molluscan host. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 4 | 20% |
| United States | 2 | 10% |
| Germany | 2 | 10% |
| France | 1 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Singapore | 1 | 5% |
| Japan | 1 | 5% |
| Spain | 1 | 5% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 6 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 70% |
| Scientists | 5 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 24 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 25% |
| Other | 3 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 13% |
| Researcher | 3 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 6 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 25% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 13% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 8% |
| Psychology | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 7 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,550,624
of 25,843,331 outputs
Outputs from Parasitology Research
#45
of 4,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,034
of 313,453 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasitology Research
#1
of 156 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,843,331 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,188 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,453 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 156 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.