↓ Skip to main content

Association between Diabetes and Keratoconus: A Retrospective Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Association between Diabetes and Keratoconus: A Retrospective Analysis
Published in
Scientific Reports, September 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41598-019-50095-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amy E. Whelchel, Tina B. McKay, Shrestha Priyadarsini, Tyler Rowsey, Dimitrios Karamichos

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unknown 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2019.
All research outputs
#12,632,140
of 14,291,740 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#60,664
of 73,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#261,122
of 314,573 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#11,558
of 13,855 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,291,740 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 73,566 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,573 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13,855 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.