↓ Skip to main content

Computational Design of Ligand Binding Proteins

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Computational Design of Ligand Binding Proteins'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 In silico Identification and Characterization of Protein-Ligand Binding Sites
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Computational Modeling of Small Molecule Ligand Binding Interactions and Affinities.
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Binding Site Prediction of Proteins with Organic Compounds or Peptides Using GALAXY Web Servers.
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Computational Design of Ligand Binding Proteins
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 PocketOptimizer and the Design of Ligand Binding Sites.
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Proteus and the Design of Ligand Binding Sites.
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 A Structure-Based Design Protocol for Optimizing Combinatorial Protein Libraries.
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Computational Design of Ligand Binding Proteins
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Computational Design of Ligand Binding Proteins
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Computational Design of Multinuclear Metalloproteins Using Unnatural Amino Acids.
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 De Novo Design of Metalloproteins and Metalloenzymes in a Three-Helix Bundle.
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Design of Light-Controlled Protein Conformations and Functions.
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Computational Introduction of Catalytic Activity into Proteins.
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Computational Design of Ligand Binding Proteins
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Design of Specific Peptide-Protein Recognition.
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Computational Design of DNA-Binding Proteins.
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Motif-Driven Design of Protein-Protein Interfaces.
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Computational Design of Ligand Binding Proteins
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Computational Design of Ligand Binding Proteins
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Computational Design of Protein Linkers.
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 Modeling of Protein-RNA Complex Structures Using Computational Docking Methods.
Attention for Chapter 19: Computational Design of Ligand Binding Proteins
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Computational Design of Ligand Binding Proteins
Chapter number 19
Book title
Computational Design of Ligand Binding Proteins
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-3569-7_19
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-3567-3, 978-1-4939-3569-7
Authors

Riley, Timothy P, Singh, Nishant K, Pierce, Brian G, Weng, Zhiping, Baker, Brian M, Timothy P. Riley, Nishant K. Singh, Brian G. Pierce, Zhiping Weng, Brian M. Baker

Editors

Barry L. Stoddard

Abstract

T-cell receptor (TCR) binding to peptide/MHC determines specificity and initiates signaling in antigen-specific cellular immune responses. Structures of TCR-pMHC complexes have provided enormous insight to cellular immune functions, permitted a rational understanding of processes such as pathogen escape, and led to the development of novel approaches for the design of vaccines and other therapeutics. As production, crystallization, and structure determination of TCR-pMHC complexes can be challenging, there is considerable interest in modeling new complexes. Here we describe a rapid approach to TCR-pMHC modeling that takes advantage of structural features conserved in known complexes, such as the restricted TCR binding site and the generally conserved diagonal docking mode. The approach relies on the powerful Rosetta suite and is implemented using the PyRosetta scripting environment. We show how the approach can recapitulate changes in TCR binding angles and other structural details, and highlight areas where careful evaluation of parameters is needed and alternative choices might be made. As TCRs are highly sensitive to subtle structural perturbations, there is room for improvement. Our method nonetheless generates high-quality models that can be foundational for structure-based hypotheses regarding TCR recognition.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 22%
Student > Master 7 19%
Researcher 5 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 5 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 8%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 9 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2016.
All research outputs
#15,369,653
of 22,865,319 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#5,350
of 13,127 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#230,936
of 393,648 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#545
of 1,470 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,865,319 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,127 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,648 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,470 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.