@ddmatta There have been good arguments that both "camps" have moved significantly towards each other in questions like nature/nurture and modularity, but I think your comment overlooks that much of this debate was about cognitive architecture & model
@cogscidude @IbnAllan More seriously my (back then) take can be found here: https://t.co/i7pk9CI5lr Generally, the grammar part of Cognitive Linguistics today is pretty equivalent with Constructionist Approaches, and generally with usage-based approaches,
@haspelmath Kind of reminds me of what @hartmast and I said in this paper, that in a lot of ways these fields are moving in the same direction but it's mainly the notation/analysis of language that's different https://t.co/wSq6Mrjuln
@GaryMarcus We have less time than we think left; history may not be written in the coming decades, we'll have little use for it. We'll grasp sooner that language isn't perception, consciousness, or a gateway to brain. It's simply an irrational, false mind