↓ Skip to main content

Standard (head-down tilt) versus modified (without head-down tilt) postural drainage in infants and young children with cystic fibrosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
121 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Standard (head-down tilt) versus modified (without head-down tilt) postural drainage in infants and young children with cystic fibrosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010297.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Diana A Freitas, Gabriela SS Chaves, Thayla A Santino, Cibele TD Ribeiro, Fernando AL Dias, Ricardo O Guerra, Karla MPP Mendonça

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 120 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 17%
Student > Bachelor 19 16%
Researcher 9 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 4%
Other 21 17%
Unknown 40 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 19%
Social Sciences 7 6%
Sports and Recreations 4 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 47 39%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2021.
All research outputs
#11,031,094
of 18,286,759 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,787
of 11,824 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#179,783
of 334,995 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#20
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,286,759 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,824 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.6. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,995 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.