You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Genomic Impact of European Colonization of the Americas
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Current Biology, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.cub.2019.09.076 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Linda Ongaro, Marilia O Scliar, Rodrigo Flores, Alessandro Raveane, Davide Marnetto, Stefania Sarno, Guido A Gnecchi-Ruscone, Marta E Alarcón-Riquelme, Etienne Patin, Pongsakorn Wangkumhang, Garrett Hellenthal, Miguel Gonzalez-Santos, Roy J King, Anastasia Kouvatsi, Oleg Balanovsky, Elena Balanovska, Lubov Atramentova, Shahlo Turdikulova, Sarabjit Mastana, Damir Marjanovic, Lejla Mulahasanovic, Andreja Leskovac, Maria F Lima-Costa, Alexandre C Pereira, Mauricio L Barreto, Bernardo L Horta, Nédio Mabunda, Celia A May, Andrés Moreno-Estrada, Alessandro Achilli, Anna Olivieri, Ornella Semino, Kristiina Tambets, Toomas Kivisild, Donata Luiselli, Antonio Torroni, Cristian Capelli, Eduardo Tarazona-Santos, Mait Metspalu, Luca Pagani, Francesco Montinaro |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 84 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 12% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 7% |
| Italy | 5 | 6% |
| Spain | 5 | 6% |
| Ireland | 3 | 4% |
| Peru | 2 | 2% |
| Estonia | 2 | 2% |
| France | 2 | 2% |
| Qatar | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Unknown | 41 | 49% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 50 | 60% |
| Scientists | 33 | 39% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 119 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 13% |
| Researcher | 14 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 11% |
| Unknown | 35 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 24 | 20% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 24 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 6% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 17 | 14% |
| Unknown | 37 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 78. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2023.
All research outputs
#558,757
of 25,880,422 outputs
Outputs from Current Biology
#2,029
of 14,837 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,124
of 378,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Biology
#44
of 238 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,880,422 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,837 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 62.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 378,313 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 238 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.