↓ Skip to main content

The Genomic Impact of European Colonization of the Americas

Overview of attention for article published in Current Biology, December 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
84 tweeters
reddit
2 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Genomic Impact of European Colonization of the Americas
Published in
Current Biology, December 2019
DOI 10.1016/j.cub.2019.09.076
Pubmed ID
Authors

Linda Ongaro, Marilia O. Scliar, Rodrigo Flores, Alessandro Raveane, Davide Marnetto, Stefania Sarno, Guido A. Gnecchi-Ruscone, Marta E. Alarcón-Riquelme, Etienne Patin, Pongsakorn Wangkumhang, Garrett Hellenthal, Miguel Gonzalez-Santos, Roy J. King, Anastasia Kouvatsi, Oleg Balanovsky, Elena Balanovska, Lubov Atramentova, Shahlo Turdikulova, Sarabjit Mastana, Damir Marjanovic, Lejla Mulahasanovic, Andreja Leskovac, Maria F. Lima-Costa, Alexandre C. Pereira, Mauricio L. Barreto, Bernardo L. Horta, Nédio Mabunda, Celia A. May, Andrés Moreno-Estrada, Alessandro Achilli, Anna Olivieri, Ornella Semino, Kristiina Tambets, Toomas Kivisild, Donata Luiselli, Antonio Torroni, Cristian Capelli, Eduardo Tarazona-Santos, Mait Metspalu, Luca Pagani, Francesco Montinaro

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 84 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 91 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 19%
Student > Bachelor 13 14%
Student > Master 12 13%
Researcher 12 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Other 13 14%
Unknown 17 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 7%
Social Sciences 6 7%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 3%
Other 16 18%
Unknown 18 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 69. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2020.
All research outputs
#461,543
of 21,173,213 outputs
Outputs from Current Biology
#1,770
of 13,080 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,163
of 346,397 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Biology
#44
of 239 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,173,213 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,080 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 53.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,397 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 239 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.