↓ Skip to main content

What's Left of the Right: Nabeyama Sadachika and Anti-communism in Transwar Japan, 1930–1960

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Asian Studies, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
7 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
What's Left of the Right: Nabeyama Sadachika and Anti-communism in Transwar Japan, 1930–1960
Published in
Journal of Asian Studies, November 2019
DOI 10.1017/s0021911819000688
Authors

Reto Hofmann

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 1 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2019.
All research outputs
#4,017,776
of 15,568,770 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Asian Studies
#100
of 812 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,438
of 323,975 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Asian Studies
#7
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,568,770 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 812 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,975 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.