↓ Skip to main content

How Labor Market Inequality Transforms Mass Politics

Overview of attention for article published in Political Science Research and Methods, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
28 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How Labor Market Inequality Transforms Mass Politics
Published in
Political Science Research and Methods, November 2019
DOI 10.1017/psrm.2018.64
Authors

Silja Häusermann, Achim Kemmerling, David Rueda

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 69 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Researcher 4 6%
Other 11 16%
Unknown 21 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 37 54%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Arts and Humanities 2 3%
Engineering 2 3%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 22 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2023.
All research outputs
#1,931,906
of 25,051,161 outputs
Outputs from Political Science Research and Methods
#122
of 533 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,451
of 367,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Political Science Research and Methods
#7
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,051,161 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 533 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,226 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.