↓ Skip to main content

Social media for the regional anesthesiologist: can we use it in place of medical journals?

Overview of attention for article published in Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
16 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Social media for the regional anesthesiologist: can we use it in place of medical journals?
Published in
Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, November 2019
DOI 10.1136/rapm-2019-100835
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tran, Bryant Winston, Dhillon, Sabrina Kaur, Overholt, Astrid Regina, Huntoon, Marc

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2019.
All research outputs
#1,668,108
of 13,918,554 outputs
Outputs from Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine
#174
of 1,597 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,307
of 231,778 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine
#14
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,918,554 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,597 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 231,778 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.