You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Whole bone testing in small animals: systematic characterization of the mechanical properties of different rodent bones available for rat fracture models
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Medical Research, February 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40001-018-0307-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Peter M. Prodinger, Peter Foehr, Dominik Bürklein, Oliver Bissinger, Hakan Pilge, Kilian Kreutzer, Rüdiger von Eisenhart-Rothe, Thomas Tischer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 67 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 10% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Researcher | 6 | 9% |
| Other | 14 | 21% |
| Unknown | 18 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 19% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 9% |
| Engineering | 6 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 15% |
| Unknown | 25 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2018.
All research outputs
#20,663,600
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Medical Research
#583
of 923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#348,550
of 455,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Medical Research
#4
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 455,332 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.