↓ Skip to main content

The power, potential, and pitfalls of open access biodiversity data in range size assessments: Lessons from the fishes

Overview of attention for article published in Ecological Indicators, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
19 tweeters
reddit
2 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The power, potential, and pitfalls of open access biodiversity data in range size assessments: Lessons from the fishes
Published in
Ecological Indicators, March 2020
DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105896
Authors

Jennifer A. Smith, Abigail L. Benson, Ye Chen, Steffany A. Yamada, Meryl C. Mims

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 29%
Researcher 3 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Professor 2 6%
Student > Master 2 6%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 10 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 35%
Environmental Science 7 23%
Computer Science 1 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 3%
Engineering 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 10 32%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2020.
All research outputs
#1,422,944
of 19,430,502 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Indicators
#187
of 2,754 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,949
of 339,466 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Indicators
#9
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,430,502 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,754 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,466 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.