↓ Skip to main content

How to Deal With Reverse Causality Using Panel Data? Recommendations for Researchers Based on a Simulation Study

Overview of attention for article published in Sociological Methods & Research, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#19 of 386)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
31 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How to Deal With Reverse Causality Using Panel Data? Recommendations for Researchers Based on a Simulation Study
Published in
Sociological Methods & Research, November 2019
DOI 10.1177/0049124119882473
Authors

Lars Leszczensky, Tobias Wolbring

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2019.
All research outputs
#701,753
of 13,935,840 outputs
Outputs from Sociological Methods & Research
#19
of 386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,026
of 237,736 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sociological Methods & Research
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,935,840 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 386 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 237,736 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them