↓ Skip to main content

How to Deal With Reverse Causality Using Panel Data? Recommendations for Researchers Based on a Simulation Study

Overview of attention for article published in Sociological Methods & Research, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#32 of 451)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
30 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
188 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How to Deal With Reverse Causality Using Panel Data? Recommendations for Researchers Based on a Simulation Study
Published in
Sociological Methods & Research, November 2019
DOI 10.1177/0049124119882473
Authors

Lars Leszczensky, Tobias Wolbring

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 188 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 188 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 63 34%
Student > Master 36 19%
Researcher 19 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 12 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 5%
Other 24 13%
Unknown 24 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 57 30%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 41 22%
Business, Management and Accounting 20 11%
Psychology 6 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 2%
Other 23 12%
Unknown 37 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2019.
All research outputs
#1,013,540
of 17,175,498 outputs
Outputs from Sociological Methods & Research
#32
of 451 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,756
of 329,904 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sociological Methods & Research
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,175,498 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 451 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,904 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them