↓ Skip to main content

How to Deal With Reverse Causality Using Panel Data? Recommendations for Researchers Based on a Simulation Study

Overview of attention for article published in Sociological Methods & Research, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
29 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
214 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
446 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How to Deal With Reverse Causality Using Panel Data? Recommendations for Researchers Based on a Simulation Study
Published in
Sociological Methods & Research, November 2019
DOI 10.1177/0049124119882473
Authors

Lars Leszczensky, Tobias Wolbring

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 446 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 446 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 103 23%
Student > Master 61 14%
Researcher 42 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 27 6%
Student > Bachelor 23 5%
Other 66 15%
Unknown 124 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 97 22%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 92 21%
Business, Management and Accounting 43 10%
Psychology 12 3%
Computer Science 8 2%
Other 47 11%
Unknown 147 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2023.
All research outputs
#1,686,091
of 25,744,802 outputs
Outputs from Sociological Methods & Research
#53
of 592 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,399
of 376,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sociological Methods & Research
#5
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,744,802 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 592 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 376,359 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.