You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Re-evolution of Durum Wheat by Introducing the Hardness and Glu-D1 Loci
Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, November 2019
Craig F. Morris, Alecia M. Kiszonas, Jessica Murray, Jeff Boehm, Maria Itria Ibba, Mingyi Zhang, Xiwen Cai
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||1||50%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||1||50%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||4||22%|
|Student > Master||2||11%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||6||33%|
|Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology||1||6%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2019.
All research outputs
of 23,175,240 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems
of 1,734 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 358,534 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,175,240 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,734 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,534 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.