↓ Skip to main content

Selenium and mercury in the hair of raccoons (Procyon lotor) and European wildcats (Felis s. silvestris) from Germany and Luxembourg

Overview of attention for article published in Ecotoxicology, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Selenium and mercury in the hair of raccoons (<Emphasis Type="Italic">Procyon lotor</Emphasis>) and European wildcats (<Emphasis Type="Italic">Felis s. silvestris</Emphasis>) from Germany and Luxembourg
Published in
Ecotoxicology, November 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10646-019-02120-3
Authors

Danuta Kosik-Bogacka, Natalia Osten-Sacken, Natalia Łanocha-Arendarczyk, Karolina Kot, Bogumiła Pilarczyk, Agnieszka Tomza-Marciniak, Joanna Podlasińska, Mateusz Chmielarz, Mike Heddergott, Alain C. Frantz, Peter Steinbach

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2019.
All research outputs
#12,660,736
of 14,322,164 outputs
Outputs from Ecotoxicology
#720
of 1,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#219,512
of 265,616 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecotoxicology
#13
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,322,164 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,137 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,616 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.