↓ Skip to main content

Titling Practices and Their Implications in Communication Research 1970-2010: Cutesy Cues Carry Citation Consequences

Overview of attention for article published in Communication Research, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Titling Practices and Their Implications in Communication Research 1970-2010: Cutesy Cues Carry Citation Consequences
Published in
Communication Research, November 2019
DOI 10.1177/0093650219887025
Authors

Keating, David M., Richards, Adam S., Palomares, Nicholas A., Banas, John A., Joyce, Nick, Rains, Stephen A.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2019.
All research outputs
#2,512,812
of 13,927,844 outputs
Outputs from Communication Research
#204
of 603 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,496
of 183,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Communication Research
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,927,844 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 603 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,986 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.