↓ Skip to main content

Titling Practices and Their Implications in Communication Research 1970-2010: Cutesy Cues Carry Citation Consequences

Overview of attention for article published in Communication Research, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
64 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Titling Practices and Their Implications in Communication Research 1970-2010: Cutesy Cues Carry Citation Consequences
Published in
Communication Research, November 2019
DOI 10.1177/0093650219887025
Authors

David M. Keating, Adam S. Richards, Nicholas A. Palomares, John A. Banas, Nick Joyce, Stephen A. Rains

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 64 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 3 23%
Student > Master 3 23%
Librarian 1 8%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Other 2 15%
Unknown 2 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 5 38%
Arts and Humanities 2 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 15%
Linguistics 1 8%
Physics and Astronomy 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 1 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2022.
All research outputs
#779,460
of 21,830,709 outputs
Outputs from Communication Research
#84
of 714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,685
of 293,758 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Communication Research
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,830,709 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 293,758 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them