You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
What are the effects of nature conservation on human well-being? A systematic map of empirical evidence from developing countries
|
---|---|
Published in |
Environmental Evidence, April 2016
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13750-016-0058-7 |
Authors |
Madeleine C. McKinnon, Samantha H. Cheng, Samuel Dupre, Janet Edmond, Ruth Garside, Louise Glew, Margaret B. Holland, Eliot Levine, Yuta J. Masuda, Daniel C. Miller, Isabella Oliveira, Justine Revenaz, Dilys Roe, Sierra Shamer, David Wilkie, Supin Wongbusarakum, Emily Woodhouse |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 83 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 16 | 19% |
United States | 10 | 12% |
Australia | 6 | 7% |
Ireland | 4 | 5% |
Italy | 3 | 4% |
France | 2 | 2% |
New Zealand | 2 | 2% |
Germany | 2 | 2% |
Sweden | 2 | 2% |
Other | 6 | 7% |
Unknown | 30 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 48 | 58% |
Scientists | 31 | 37% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 4% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 508 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
United States | 2 | <1% |
Italy | 1 | <1% |
Nepal | 1 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 499 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 93 | 18% |
Researcher | 90 | 18% |
Student > Master | 73 | 14% |
Other | 26 | 5% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 26 | 5% |
Other | 91 | 18% |
Unknown | 109 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 132 | 26% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 84 | 17% |
Social Sciences | 47 | 9% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 18 | 4% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 14 | 3% |
Other | 65 | 13% |
Unknown | 148 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 60. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2021.
All research outputs
#692,029
of 24,891,087 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Evidence
#14
of 323 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,531
of 304,736 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Evidence
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,891,087 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 323 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 304,736 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.