↓ Skip to main content

What are the effects of nature conservation on human well-being? A systematic map of empirical evidence from developing countries

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Evidence, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#14 of 323)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
83 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
159 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
508 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
What are the effects of nature conservation on human well-being? A systematic map of empirical evidence from developing countries
Published in
Environmental Evidence, April 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13750-016-0058-7
Authors

Madeleine C. McKinnon, Samantha H. Cheng, Samuel Dupre, Janet Edmond, Ruth Garside, Louise Glew, Margaret B. Holland, Eliot Levine, Yuta J. Masuda, Daniel C. Miller, Isabella Oliveira, Justine Revenaz, Dilys Roe, Sierra Shamer, David Wilkie, Supin Wongbusarakum, Emily Woodhouse

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 83 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 508 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Nepal 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 499 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 93 18%
Researcher 90 18%
Student > Master 73 14%
Other 26 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 26 5%
Other 91 18%
Unknown 109 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 132 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 84 17%
Social Sciences 47 9%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 18 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 14 3%
Other 65 13%
Unknown 148 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 60. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2021.
All research outputs
#692,029
of 24,891,087 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Evidence
#14
of 323 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,531
of 304,736 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Evidence
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,891,087 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 323 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 304,736 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.