↓ Skip to main content

Local anaesthetic nerve block for pain management in labour

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
95 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Local anaesthetic nerve block for pain management in labour
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009200.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Natalia Novikova, Catherine Cluver

Abstract

Local anaesthetic nerve block is an important modality for pain management in labour. Pudendal and paracervical block (PCB) are most commonly performed local anaesthetic nerve blocks which have been used for decades.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
France 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 91 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 22%
Researcher 17 18%
Unspecified 12 13%
Student > Bachelor 11 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 7%
Other 27 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 17%
Unspecified 15 16%
Psychology 8 8%
Social Sciences 7 7%
Other 5 5%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2016.
All research outputs
#7,230,389
of 12,527,093 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,336
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,411
of 118,161 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#73
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,093 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 118,161 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.