↓ Skip to main content

Can Economic Assistance Shape Combatant Support in Wartime? Experimental Evidence from Afghanistan

Overview of attention for article published in American Political Science Review, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
110 tweeters
Title
Can Economic Assistance Shape Combatant Support in Wartime? Experimental Evidence from Afghanistan
Published in
American Political Science Review, November 2019
DOI 10.1017/s0003055419000698
Authors

JASON LYALL, YANG-YANG ZHOU, KOSUKE IMAI

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 110 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 84. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2019.
All research outputs
#209,369
of 13,993,109 outputs
Outputs from American Political Science Review
#57
of 1,458 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,985
of 219,730 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Political Science Review
#4
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,993,109 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,458 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 219,730 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.