↓ Skip to main content

Estimating the value of mangrove leaf litter in sesarmid crab diets: the importance of fractionation factors

Overview of attention for article published in Bulletin of Marine Science, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Estimating the value of mangrove leaf litter in sesarmid crab diets: the importance of fractionation factors
Published in
Bulletin of Marine Science, July 2020
DOI 10.5343/bms.2019.0026
Authors

Richard A MacKenzie, Nicole Cormier, Amanda W Demopoulos

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 40%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 40%
Researcher 1 20%
Lecturer 1 20%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 20%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 60%
Environmental Science 2 40%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 20%
Psychology 1 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2020.
All research outputs
#9,285,757
of 15,824,481 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of Marine Science
#140
of 232 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#191,741
of 371,400 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of Marine Science
#15
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,824,481 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 232 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 371,400 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.