You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Cordage, basketry and containers at the Pleistocene–Holocene boundary in southwest Europe. Evidence from Coves de Santa Maira (Valencian region, Spain)
Vegetation History and Archaeobotany, November 2019
J. Emili Aura Tortosa, Guillem Pérez-Jordà, Yolanda Carrión Marco, Joan R. Seguí Seguí, Jesús F. Jordá Pardo, Carles Miret i Estruch, C. Carlos Verdasco Cebrián
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 46 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||45||98%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Master||6||16%|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||3||8%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Arts and Humanities||18||47%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 48. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2023.
All research outputs
of 24,520,935 outputs
Outputs from Vegetation History and Archaeobotany
of 440 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 371,834 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Vegetation History and Archaeobotany
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,520,935 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 440 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 371,834 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.