↓ Skip to main content

Potential Factors Influencing Regional Differences and Similarities in Multiregional Clinical Trials

Overview of attention for article published in Drug Information Journal, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Potential Factors Influencing Regional Differences and Similarities in Multiregional Clinical Trials
Published in
Drug Information Journal, April 2012
DOI 10.1177/0092861512443747
Authors

Masahiko Ohishi

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 40%
Student > Master 2 40%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 80%
Psychology 1 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2012.
All research outputs
#7,829,641
of 12,478,310 outputs
Outputs from Drug Information Journal
#111
of 118 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,524
of 117,811 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Drug Information Journal
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,478,310 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 118 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 117,811 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them