You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants vs. vitamin-K antagonists in patients with atrial fibrillation and chronic kidney disease: a nationwide cohort study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Thrombosis Journal, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12959-019-0211-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Emma Kirstine Laugesen, Laila Staerk, Nicholas Carlson, Anne-Lise Kamper, Jonas Bjerring Olesen, Christian Torp-Pedersen, Gunnar Gislason, Anders Nissen Bonde |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Denmark | 2 | 33% |
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Scientists | 2 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 53 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 8 | 15% |
| Unknown | 18 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 36% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 11% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 18 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2019.
All research outputs
#14,490,189
of 25,703,943 outputs
Outputs from Thrombosis Journal
#178
of 420 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#177,103
of 376,124 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Thrombosis Journal
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,703,943 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 420 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 376,124 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them