↓ Skip to main content

What Caused the Extraordinarily Hot 2018 Summer in Korea?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the Meteorological Society of Japan, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (57th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
What Caused the Extraordinarily Hot 2018 Summer in Korea?
Published in
Journal of the Meteorological Society of Japan, January 2020
DOI 10.2151/jmsj.2020-009
Authors

Kyung-Ja HA, Ji-Hye YEO, Ye-Won SEO, Eui-Seok CHUNG, Ja-Yeon MOON, Xuelei FENG, Yang-Won LEE, Chang-Hoi HO

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2019.
All research outputs
#7,203,423
of 14,051,039 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Meteorological Society of Japan
#166
of 443 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,524
of 259,416 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Meteorological Society of Japan
#8
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,051,039 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 443 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 259,416 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.