↓ Skip to main content

An experimental study on the rate and mechanism of capillary rise in sandstone

Overview of attention for article published in Progress in Earth and Planetary Science, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An experimental study on the rate and mechanism of capillary rise in sandstone
Published in
Progress in Earth and Planetary Science, April 2016
DOI 10.1186/s40645-016-0086-5
Authors

Yuya Tsunazawa, Tadashi Yokoyama, Naoki Nishiyama

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
Unknown 41 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 21%
Student > Bachelor 7 17%
Student > Master 6 14%
Researcher 4 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 10 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 12 29%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 17%
Chemical Engineering 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Environmental Science 2 5%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 11 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2016.
All research outputs
#17,800,994
of 22,867,327 outputs
Outputs from Progress in Earth and Planetary Science
#409
of 515 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#205,039
of 299,116 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Progress in Earth and Planetary Science
#8
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,867,327 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 515 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 299,116 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.