↓ Skip to main content

Interventions for treating acute elbow dislocations in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
95 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions for treating acute elbow dislocations in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007908.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fraser Taylor, Martyn Sims, Jean-Claude Theis, G Peter Herbison

Abstract

Dislocation of the elbow joint is a relatively uncommon injury.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 2%
Portugal 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 91 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 27%
Student > Bachelor 15 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 11%
Researcher 8 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Other 17 18%
Unknown 12 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 47%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 18%
Computer Science 4 4%
Sports and Recreations 3 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 15 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2019.
All research outputs
#7,749,103
of 15,099,074 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,181
of 11,107 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,602
of 125,816 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#66
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,099,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,107 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.8. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 125,816 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.