You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Aromatherapy for treatment of postoperative nausea and vomiting
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd007598.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sonia Hines, Elizabeth Steels, Anne Chang, Kristen Gibbons |
| Abstract |
Postoperative nausea and vomiting is a common and unpleasant phenomenon and current therapies are not always effective for all patients. Aromatherapy has been suggested as a possible addition to the available treatment strategies. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 45% |
| Comoros | 1 | 9% |
| France | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 4 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 73% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 27% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 235 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 3 | 1% |
| United States | 3 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 225 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 33 | 14% |
| Researcher | 28 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 25 | 11% |
| Other | 22 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 8% |
| Other | 53 | 23% |
| Unknown | 56 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 76 | 32% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 42 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 11 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 26 | 11% |
| Unknown | 60 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 48. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2023.
All research outputs
#900,900
of 25,887,951 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,664
of 13,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,271
of 175,174 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#14
of 185 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,887,951 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,154 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,174 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 185 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.