↓ Skip to main content

Active and passive: two ways party systems influence electoral outcomes

Overview of attention for article published in European Political Science Review, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Active and passive: two ways party systems influence electoral outcomes
Published in
European Political Science Review, November 2019
DOI 10.1017/s1755773919000250
Authors

Miroslav Nemčok

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2019.
All research outputs
#2,002,560
of 14,030,961 outputs
Outputs from European Political Science Review
#67
of 206 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,757
of 237,977 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Political Science Review
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,030,961 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 206 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 237,977 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them