↓ Skip to main content

Comprehensive analysis of Twitter activity on #Incontinence

Overview of attention for article published in Neurourology and Urodynamics, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
f1000
1 research highlight platform
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comprehensive analysis of Twitter activity on #Incontinence
Published in
Neurourology and Urodynamics, November 2019
DOI 10.1002/nau.24227
Pubmed ID
Authors

Markus Grabbert, Wael Y. Khoder, Christian Gratzke, Pia Paffenholz, Johannes Salem, Ricarda M. Bauer

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2019.
All research outputs
#4,380,147
of 14,395,965 outputs
Outputs from Neurourology and Urodynamics
#341
of 1,491 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,726
of 326,531 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurourology and Urodynamics
#26
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,395,965 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,491 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,531 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.