↓ Skip to main content

Who Leads the Conversation on Climate Change?: A Study of a Global Network of NGOs on Twitter

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Communication: A Journal of Nature and Culture, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 tweeters
Title
Who Leads the Conversation on Climate Change?: A Study of a Global Network of NGOs on Twitter
Published in
Environmental Communication: A Journal of Nature and Culture, November 2019
DOI 10.1080/17524032.2019.1687099
Authors

Hong Tien Vu, Hung Viet Do, Hyunjin Seo, Yuchen Liu

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2019.
All research outputs
#1,170,619
of 13,976,935 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Communication: A Journal of Nature and Culture
#73
of 337 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,673
of 209,079 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Communication: A Journal of Nature and Culture
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,976,935 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 337 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,079 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.