↓ Skip to main content

Angiotensin receptor blockers for heart failure

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
16 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
107 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Angiotensin receptor blockers for heart failure
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003040.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Balraj S Heran, Vijaya M Musini, Ken Bassett, Rod S Taylor, James M Wright

Abstract

Chronic heart failure (HF) is a prevalent world-wide. Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) are widely prescribed for chronic HF although their role is controversial.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Unknown 105 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 6 6%
Student > Bachelor 4 4%
Student > Master 3 3%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 2%
Researcher 2 2%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 86 80%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 15%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Chemistry 1 <1%
Unspecified 1 <1%
Unknown 86 80%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2017.
All research outputs
#1,119,789
of 12,914,125 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,485
of 10,424 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,085
of 119,706 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#26
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,914,125 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,424 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 119,706 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.