You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Implementation of earlier antibiotic administration in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock in Japan: a descriptive analysis of a prospective observational study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Critical Care, November 2019
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13054-019-2644-x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Toshikazu Abe, Shigeki Kushimoto, Yasuharu Tokuda, Gary S. Phillips, Andrew Rhodes, Takehiro Sugiyama, Akira Komori, Hiroki Iriyama, Hiroshi Ogura, Seitaro Fujishima, Atsushi Shiraishi, Daizoh Saitoh, Toshihiko Mayumi, Toshio Naito, Kiyotsugu Takuma, Taka-aki Nakada, Yasukazu Shiino, Takehiko Tarui, Toru Hifumi, Yasuhiro Otomo, Kohji Okamoto, Yutaka Umemura, Joji Kotani, Yuichiro Sakamoto, Junichi Sasaki, Shin-ichiro Shiraishi, Ryosuke Tsuruta, Akiyoshi Hagiwara, Kazuma Yamakawa, Tomohiko Masuno, Naoshi Takeyama, Norio Yamashita, Hiroto Ikeda, Masashi Ueyama, Satoshi Gando |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 16 | 33% |
United States | 2 | 4% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 4% |
Unknown | 29 | 59% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 45 | 92% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 91 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 12 | 13% |
Other | 10 | 11% |
Researcher | 6 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 7% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 5% |
Other | 15 | 16% |
Unknown | 37 | 41% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 33% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 9% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 5% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 2% |
Engineering | 2 | 2% |
Other | 5 | 5% |
Unknown | 39 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2020.
All research outputs
#1,170,399
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#971
of 6,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,778
of 471,675 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#18
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 471,675 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.