You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
2010 International consensus algorithm for the diagnosis, therapy and management of hereditary angioedema
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology, July 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1710-1492-6-24 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tom Bowen, Marco Cicardi, Henriette Farkas, Konrad Bork, Hilary J Longhurst, Bruce Zuraw, Emel Aygoeren-Pürsün, Timothy Craig, Karen Binkley, Jacques Hebert, Bruce Ritchie, Laurence Bouillet, Stephen Betschel, Della Cogar, John Dean, Ramachand Devaraj, Azza Hamed, Palinder Kamra, Paul K Keith, Gina Lacuesta, Eric Leith, Harriet Lyons, Sean Mace, Barbara Mako, Doris Neurath, Man-Chiu Poon, Georges-Etienne Rivard, Robert Schellenberg, Dereth Rowan, Anne Rowe, Donald Stark, Smeeksha Sur, Ellie Tsai, Richard Warrington, Susan Waserman, Rohan Ameratunga, Jonathan Bernstein, Janne Björkander, Kristylea Brosz, John Brosz, Anette Bygum, Teresa Caballero, Mike Frank, George Fust, George Harmat, Amin Kanani, Wolfhart Kreuz, Marcel Levi, Henry Li, Inmaculada Martinez-Saguer, Dumitru Moldovan, Istvan Nagy, Erik W Nielsen, Patrik Nordenfelt, Avner Reshef, Eva Rusicke, Sarah Smith-Foltz, Peter Späth, Lilian Varga, Zhi Yu Xiang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 205 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 1% |
| Turkey | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 192 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 33 | 16% |
| Other | 29 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 19 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 6% |
| Other | 47 | 23% |
| Unknown | 46 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 107 | 52% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 8% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 8 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 16 | 8% |
| Unknown | 50 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2018.
All research outputs
#3,121,639
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology
#204
of 924 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,937
of 103,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 924 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,502 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.