↓ Skip to main content

2010 International consensus algorithm for the diagnosis, therapy and management of hereditary angioedema

Overview of attention for article published in Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology, July 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
365 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
142 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
2010 International consensus algorithm for the diagnosis, therapy and management of hereditary angioedema
Published in
Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology, July 2010
DOI 10.1186/1710-1492-6-24
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tom Bowen, Marco Cicardi, Henriette Farkas, Konrad Bork, Hilary J Longhurst, Bruce Zuraw, Emel Aygoeren-Pürsün, Timothy Craig, Karen Binkley, Jacques Hebert, Bruce Ritchie, Laurence Bouillet, Stephen Betschel, Della Cogar, John Dean, Ramachand Devaraj, Azza Hamed, Palinder Kamra, Paul K Keith, Gina Lacuesta, Eric Leith, Harriet Lyons, Sean Mace, Barbara Mako, Doris Neurath, Man-Chiu Poon, Georges-Etienne Rivard, Robert Schellenberg, Dereth Rowan, Anne Rowe, Donald Stark, Smeeksha Sur, Ellie Tsai, Richard Warrington, Susan Waserman, Rohan Ameratunga, Jonathan Bernstein, Janne Björkander, Kristylea Brosz, John Brosz, Anette Bygum, Teresa Caballero, Mike Frank, George Fust, George Harmat, Amin Kanani, Wolfhart Kreuz, Marcel Levi, Henry Li, Inmaculada Martinez-Saguer, Dumitru Moldovan, Istvan Nagy, Erik W Nielsen, Patrik Nordenfelt, Avner Reshef, Eva Rusicke, Sarah Smith-Foltz, Peter Späth, Lilian Varga, Zhi Yu Xiang

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 3 2%
Turkey 2 1%
Italy 2 1%
Brazil 2 1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 129 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 29 20%
Other 24 17%
Student > Master 15 11%
Student > Postgraduate 14 10%
Student > Bachelor 11 8%
Other 40 28%
Unknown 9 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 96 68%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 5%
Social Sciences 2 1%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 1%
Other 7 5%
Unknown 14 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2018.
All research outputs
#1,218,049
of 12,576,527 outputs
Outputs from Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology
#108
of 463 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,053
of 261,633 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,576,527 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 463 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 261,633 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them