You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Developing evidence briefs for policy: a qualitative case study comparing the process of using a guidance-contextualization workbook in Peru and Uganda
|
---|---|
Published in |
Health Research Policy and Systems, November 2019
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12961-019-0488-0 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Elizabeth Alvarez, John N. Lavis, Melissa Brouwers, Gloria Carmona Clavijo, Nelson Sewankambo, Lely Solari, Lisa Schwartz |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 4 | 67% |
Colombia | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 50% |
Members of the public | 2 | 33% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 59 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 13 | 22% |
Researcher | 11 | 19% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 5% |
Lecturer | 2 | 3% |
Librarian | 2 | 3% |
Other | 7 | 12% |
Unknown | 21 | 36% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 15% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 10% |
Social Sciences | 5 | 8% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
Other | 10 | 17% |
Unknown | 24 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2020.
All research outputs
#14,052,992
of 23,796,227 outputs
Outputs from Health Research Policy and Systems
#994
of 1,248 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#227,852
of 461,520 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Research Policy and Systems
#21
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,796,227 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,248 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 461,520 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.