↓ Skip to main content

Computational neurorehabilitation: modeling plasticity and learning to predict recovery

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
31 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
140 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
635 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Computational neurorehabilitation: modeling plasticity and learning to predict recovery
Published in
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, April 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12984-016-0148-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

David J. Reinkensmeyer, Etienne Burdet, Maura Casadio, John W. Krakauer, Gert Kwakkel, Catherine E. Lang, Stephan P. Swinnen, Nick S. Ward, Nicolas Schweighofer

Abstract

Despite progress in using computational approaches to inform medicine and neuroscience in the last 30 years, there have been few attempts to model the mechanisms underlying sensorimotor rehabilitation. We argue that a fundamental understanding of neurologic recovery, and as a result accurate predictions at the individual level, will be facilitated by developing computational models of the salient neural processes, including plasticity and learning systems of the brain, and integrating them into a context specific to rehabilitation. Here, we therefore discuss Computational Neurorehabilitation, a newly emerging field aimed at modeling plasticity and motor learning to understand and improve movement recovery of individuals with neurologic impairment. We first explain how the emergence of robotics and wearable sensors for rehabilitation is providing data that make development and testing of such models increasingly feasible. We then review key aspects of plasticity and motor learning that such models will incorporate. We proceed by discussing how computational neurorehabilitation models relate to the current benchmark in rehabilitation modeling - regression-based, prognostic modeling. We then critically discuss the first computational neurorehabilitation models, which have primarily focused on modeling rehabilitation of the upper extremity after stroke, and show how even simple models have produced novel ideas for future investigation. Finally, we conclude with key directions for future research, anticipating that soon we will see the emergence of mechanistic models of motor recovery that are informed by clinical imaging results and driven by the actual movement content of rehabilitation therapy as well as wearable sensor-based records of daily activity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 635 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 622 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 142 22%
Researcher 90 14%
Student > Master 76 12%
Student > Bachelor 56 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 36 6%
Other 117 18%
Unknown 118 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 153 24%
Neuroscience 101 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 54 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 51 8%
Computer Science 28 4%
Other 96 15%
Unknown 152 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2020.
All research outputs
#1,815,042
of 25,257,066 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#65
of 1,400 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,044
of 304,953 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#4
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,257,066 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,400 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 304,953 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.