You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
High levels of RNA-editing site conservation amongst 15 laboratory mouse strains
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genome Biology, April 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/gb-2012-13-4-r26 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Petr Danecek, Christoffer Nellåker, Rebecca E McIntyre, Jorge E Buendia-Buendia, Suzannah Bumpstead, Chris P Ponting, Jonathan Flint, Richard Durbin, Thomas M Keane, David J Adams |
| Abstract |
Adenosine-to-inosine (A-to-I) editing is a site-selective post-transcriptional alteration of double-stranded RNA by ADAR deaminases that is crucial for homeostasis and development. Recently the Mouse Genomes Project generated genome sequences for 17 laboratory mouse strains and rich catalogues of variants. We also generated RNA-seq data from whole brain RNA from 15 of the sequenced strains. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 13 | 42% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 16% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Austria | 1 | 3% |
| Japan | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Tunisia | 1 | 3% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 6 | 19% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 15 | 48% |
| Members of the public | 13 | 42% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 222 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 5% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 199 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 63 | 28% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 46 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 26 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 6% |
| Professor | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 35 | 16% |
| Unknown | 27 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 125 | 56% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 32 | 14% |
| Computer Science | 9 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 4% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 9 | 4% |
| Unknown | 35 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2017.
All research outputs
#1,027,339
of 25,397,764 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#738
of 4,470 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,211
of 175,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#5
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,397,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,470 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,230 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.