You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Challenges in assessing the vulnerability of species to climate change to inform conservation actions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Conservation, July 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.04.020 |
| Authors |
N. Butt, H.P. Possingham, C. De Los Rios, R. Maggini, R.A. Fuller, S.L. Maxwell, J.E.M. Watson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 4 | 15% |
| Canada | 4 | 15% |
| United States | 4 | 15% |
| Spain | 2 | 8% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 4% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 4% |
| Brazil | 1 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 8 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 21 | 81% |
| Scientists | 5 | 19% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 269 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 262 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 51 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 49 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 40 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 9% |
| Professor | 12 | 4% |
| Other | 48 | 18% |
| Unknown | 44 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 101 | 38% |
| Environmental Science | 86 | 32% |
| Engineering | 7 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 4% |
| Unknown | 52 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2020.
All research outputs
#2,009,279
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#1,654
of 6,902 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,393
of 373,353 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#24
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,902 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 373,353 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.