↓ Skip to main content

Challenges in assessing the vulnerability of species to climate change to inform conservation actions

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Conservation, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
29 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
160 Mendeley
Title
Challenges in assessing the vulnerability of species to climate change to inform conservation actions
Published in
Biological Conservation, July 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.04.020
Authors

N. Butt, H.P. Possingham, C. De Los Rios, R. Maggini, R.A. Fuller, S.L. Maxwell, J.E.M. Watson

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 160 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 149 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 36 23%
Student > Master 34 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 18%
Student > Bachelor 11 7%
Unspecified 11 7%
Other 39 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 70 44%
Environmental Science 54 34%
Unspecified 13 8%
Engineering 6 4%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Other 12 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2017.
All research outputs
#946,209
of 12,238,739 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#806
of 3,540 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,506
of 274,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#23
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,238,739 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,540 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,318 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.