↓ Skip to main content

BITS2018: the fifteenth annual meeting of the Italian Society of Bioinformatics

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
BITS2018: the fifteenth annual meeting of the Italian Society of Bioinformatics
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, November 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12859-019-3175-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Francesca Cordero, Raffaele A. Calogero, Michele Caselle

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2020.
All research outputs
#4,467,002
of 15,418,159 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#1,938
of 5,633 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,047
of 356,680 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#226
of 592 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,418,159 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,633 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,680 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 592 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.