↓ Skip to main content

Nutrient loading and nonstationarity: The importance of differentiating the independent effects of tributary flow and nutrient concentration

Overview of attention for article published in Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Nutrient loading and nonstationarity: The importance of differentiating the independent effects of tributary flow and nutrient concentration
Published in
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water, November 2019
DOI 10.1002/wat2.1396
Authors

Craig A. Stow, Qianqian Liu, Eric J. Anderson

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 17%
Researcher 1 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 17%
Student > Master 1 17%
Unknown 2 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 2 33%
Engineering 2 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 17%
Unknown 1 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2019.
All research outputs
#10,402,369
of 16,295,273 outputs
Outputs from Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water
#258
of 311 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#227,991
of 386,974 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water
#27
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,295,273 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 311 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 386,974 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.