↓ Skip to main content

Does whole-body electrical muscle stimulation combined with strength training promote morphofunctional alterations?

Overview of attention for article published in Clinics, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Does whole-body electrical muscle stimulation combined with strength training promote morphofunctional alterations?
Published in
Clinics, January 2019
DOI 10.6061/clinics/2019/e1334
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexandre Lopes Evangelista, Cauê Vazquez La Scala Teixeira, Bruna Massaroto Barros, Jônatas Bezerra de Azevedo, Marcos Rodolfo Ramos Paunksnis, Cleison Rodrigues de Souza, Tanuj Wadhi, Roberta Luksevicius Rica, Tiago Volpi Braz, Danilo Sales Bocalini

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 63 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 17%
Researcher 7 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 27 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 13 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 5%
Neuroscience 3 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 31 49%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2021.
All research outputs
#2,568,688
of 21,241,420 outputs
Outputs from Clinics
#84
of 668 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,643
of 433,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinics
#14
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,241,420 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 668 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,555 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.