↓ Skip to main content

Flow Management for Hydropower Extirpates Aquatic Insects, Undermining River Food Webs

Overview of attention for article published in BioScience, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
13 news outlets
blogs
7 blogs
twitter
43 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
110 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
253 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Flow Management for Hydropower Extirpates Aquatic Insects, Undermining River Food Webs
Published in
BioScience, May 2016
DOI 10.1093/biosci/biw059
Authors

Theodore A. Kennedy, Jeffrey D. Muehlbauer, Charles B. Yackulic, David A. Lytle, Scott W. Miller, Kimberly L. Dibble, Eric W. Kortenhoeven, Anya N. Metcalfe, Colden V. Baxter

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 43 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 253 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 249 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 55 22%
Student > Master 48 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 15%
Student > Bachelor 20 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 7%
Other 38 15%
Unknown 36 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 95 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 68 27%
Engineering 14 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 10 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Other 16 6%
Unknown 46 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 167. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2022.
All research outputs
#203,101
of 22,867,327 outputs
Outputs from BioScience
#85
of 2,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,191
of 298,446 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioScience
#2
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,867,327 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,968 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 298,446 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.