You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Geospatial mapping and resource utilization tool in support of a national smoke-free public housing rule
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Research Notes, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13104-019-4815-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sonia Tetlow, Brian Gurbaxani, Corinne Graffunder, Connor Owen, Diem Tran, Jiali Zhao, Jose A. Rodriguez, Aaron Ahn, Kristie Choe, Vishal Mummigatti, Divya Vedula, Kathleen Hayes, Miriam Kelly, Simon McNabb, Julie Swann |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 39 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 5 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 13% |
| Unknown | 19 | 49% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 13% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 5% |
| Engineering | 2 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 19 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2019.
All research outputs
#13,903,378
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#1,718
of 4,305 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#226,675
of 461,385 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#21
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,305 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 461,385 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.