You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Prevalence of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in European populations based on cross-validated diagnostic thresholds
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cardiovascular Ultrasound, March 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1476-7120-10-10 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Malgorzata Kloch-Badelek, Tatiana Kuznetsova, Wojciech Sakiewicz, Valérie Tikhonoff, Andrew Ryabikov, Arantxa González, Begoña López, Lutgarde Thijs, Yu Jin, Sofia Malyutina, Katarzyna Stolarz-Skrzypek, Edoardo Casiglia, Javier Díez, Krzysztof Narkiewicz, Kalina Kawecka-Jaszcz, Jan A Staessen, the European Project On Genes in Hypertension (EPOGH) Investigators |
Abstract |
Different diagnostic criteria limit comparisons between populations in the prevalence of diastolic left ventricular (LV) dysfunction. We aimed to compare across populations age-specific echocardiographic criteria for diastolic LV dysfunction as well as their correlates and prevalence. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 60 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 15% |
Student > Master | 9 | 15% |
Researcher | 7 | 11% |
Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 7% |
Other | 14 | 23% |
Unknown | 13 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 38 | 62% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
Linguistics | 1 | 2% |
Other | 2 | 3% |
Unknown | 16 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2012.
All research outputs
#15,243,120
of 22,664,644 outputs
Outputs from Cardiovascular Ultrasound
#188
of 310 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,868
of 159,670 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cardiovascular Ultrasound
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,664,644 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 310 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 159,670 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them