| Title |
Opposite latitudinal patterns for bird and arthropod predation revealed in experiments with differently colored artificial prey
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ecology and Evolution, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/ece3.5862 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elena L. Zvereva, Bastien Castagneyrol, Tatiana Cornelissen, Anders Forsman, Juan Antonio Hernández‐Agüero, Tero Klemola, Lucas Paolucci, Vicente Polo, Norma Salinas, Kasselman Jurie Theron, Guorui Xu, Vitali Zverev, Mikhail V. Kozlov |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 3 | 16% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 11% |
| France | 2 | 11% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 5% |
| Finland | 1 | 5% |
| Poland | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 9 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 9 | 47% |
| Members of the public | 8 | 42% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 85 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 15 | 18% |
| Unknown | 25 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 42 | 49% |
| Environmental Science | 8 | 9% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 1% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 30 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2021.
All research outputs
#3,022,657
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Ecology and Evolution
#1,743
of 8,480 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,845
of 473,254 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecology and Evolution
#51
of 187 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,480 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 473,254 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 187 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.