You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Do Top Managers’ Individual Characteristics Affect Accounting Manipulation in the Public Sector?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1093/jopart/muz038 |
| Authors |
Eugenio Anessi-Pessina, Mariafrancesca Sicilia |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 5 | 26% |
| United States | 2 | 11% |
| Denmark | 1 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 9 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 58% |
| Scientists | 7 | 37% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 113 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 7 | 6% |
| Professor | 7 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 19 | 17% |
| Unknown | 58 | 51% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 29 | 26% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 9% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 9 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 58 | 51% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2022.
All research outputs
#3,188,029
of 25,698,912 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory
#207
of 768 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,763
of 479,709 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory
#5
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,698,912 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 768 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 479,709 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.