↓ Skip to main content

Do Top Managers’ Individual Characteristics Affect Accounting Manipulation in the Public Sector?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
23 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Do Top Managers’ Individual Characteristics Affect Accounting Manipulation in the Public Sector?
Published in
Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory, November 2019
DOI 10.1093/jopart/muz038
Authors

Eugenio Anessi-Pessina, Mariafrancesca Sicilia

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 4 27%
Student > Bachelor 2 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 13%
Student > Master 2 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 1 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 7 47%
Social Sciences 5 33%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 7%
Computer Science 1 7%
Unknown 1 7%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2020.
All research outputs
#1,581,668
of 15,964,640 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory
#125
of 577 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,509
of 375,661 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory
#12
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,964,640 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 577 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 375,661 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.