↓ Skip to main content

True and false positive rates for different criteria of evaluating statistical evidence from clinical trials

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
34 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
True and false positive rates for different criteria of evaluating statistical evidence from clinical trials
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, November 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12874-019-0865-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Don van Ravenzwaaij, John P. A. Ioannidis

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 25%
Student > Bachelor 5 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 10%
Professor 1 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 3 15%
Mathematics 2 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 5%
Energy 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 9 45%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2020.
All research outputs
#906,029
of 19,462,049 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#114
of 1,755 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,486
of 418,648 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#21
of 196 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,462,049 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,755 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 418,648 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 196 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.