↓ Skip to main content

Small population size and low genomic diversity have no effect on fitness in experimental translocations of a wild fish

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Small population size and low genomic diversity have no effect on fitness in experimental translocations of a wild fish
Published in
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, November 2019
DOI 10.1098/rspb.2019.1989
Pubmed ID
Authors

M. C. Yates, E. Bowles, D. J. Fraser

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 65 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 18%
Student > Master 11 17%
Researcher 10 15%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Other 3 5%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 16 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 46%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 12%
Environmental Science 8 12%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 2%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 16 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2024.
All research outputs
#8,346,991
of 25,593,129 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#8,083
of 11,390 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#172,151
of 478,955 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#100
of 119 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,593,129 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,390 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.6. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 478,955 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 119 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.