↓ Skip to main content

Security and equity of conservation covenants: Contradictions of private protected area policies in Australia

Overview of attention for article published in Land Use Policy, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
115 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Security and equity of conservation covenants: Contradictions of private protected area policies in Australia
Published in
Land Use Policy, January 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.03.009
Authors

Vanessa M. Adams, Katie Moon

Twitter Demographics

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 5 4%
Switzerland 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 105 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 21%
Researcher 22 19%
Student > Master 19 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 10%
Student > Postgraduate 6 5%
Other 21 18%
Unknown 12 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 51 44%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 13%
Social Sciences 12 10%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 6 5%
Computer Science 3 3%
Other 9 8%
Unknown 19 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 46. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2022.
All research outputs
#776,649
of 23,033,713 outputs
Outputs from Land Use Policy
#77
of 2,447 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,483
of 282,233 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Land Use Policy
#1
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,033,713 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,447 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,233 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.