↓ Skip to main content

From the heart to the mind's eye: Cardiac vagal tone is related to visual perception of fearful faces at high spatial frequency

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Psychology, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
162 Mendeley
Title
From the heart to the mind's eye: Cardiac vagal tone is related to visual perception of fearful faces at high spatial frequency
Published in
Biological Psychology, February 2012
DOI 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2012.02.012
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gewnhi Park, Jay J. Van Bavel, Michael W. Vasey, Eric J.L. Egan, Julian F. Thayer

Abstract

The neurovisceral integration model (Thayer and Lane, 2000) proposes that vagally mediated heart rate variability (HRV)--an index of cardiac vagal tone--is associated with autonomic flexibility and emotional self-regulation. Two experiments examined the relationship between vagally mediated HRV and visual perception of affectively significant stimuli at different spatial frequencies. In Experiment 1, HRV was positively correlated with superior performance discriminating the emotion of affectively significant (i.e., fearful) faces at high spatial frequency (HSF). In Experiment 2, processing goals moderated the relationship between HRV and successful discrimination of HSF fearful faces. In contrast to Experiment 1, discriminating the expressiveness of HSF fearful faces was not correlated with HRV. The current research suggests that HRV is positively associated with superior visual discrimination of affectively significant stimuli at high spatial frequency, and this relationship may be sensitive to the top-down influence of different processing goals.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 162 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Canada 2 1%
Germany 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 152 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 22%
Researcher 22 14%
Student > Master 22 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 12%
Student > Bachelor 13 8%
Other 34 21%
Unknown 15 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 87 54%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 6%
Social Sciences 8 5%
Neuroscience 7 4%
Other 14 9%
Unknown 21 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2012.
All research outputs
#22,759,802
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Biological Psychology
#1,650
of 1,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,746
of 168,056 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Psychology
#21
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,056 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.